Widgetized Section

Go to Admin » Appearance » Widgets » and move Gabfire Widget: Social into that MastheadOverlay zone

Jane Kenyon Story In Private Eye

Say No To Joe - Read About It Here

.
JANE KENYON: POLICE MISCONDUCT UPDATE (IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST)

Following Tim Hick’s detailed account of crimes committed by Councillor Kenyon (released first Real Whitby readers on Sunday 9th July 2012), the investigative magazine PRIVATE EYE has run an exposé in today’s issue.

The article appears in their “Rotten Boroughs” column – Fleet Street’s pre-eminent investigative forum, dedicated to exposing Local Government corruption.

Hicks commented:

“I feel deeply saddened, following the series of corruption scandals surrounding Chief Police Officers in North Yorkshire – some of which remain unresolved – that ordinary rank-and-file Police officers and civilian staff of North Yorkshire Police have been let down so badly by a member of their senior management so soon on the heels of the Chief Constable Grahame Maxwell humiliation. 

The North Yorkshire Police Authority is led by a person whom the Police Authority openly admits has committed a criminal offence – an offence punishable by disbarrment from being a Councillor Astonishingly, the NYPA deems this is ‘a minor infraction’. 

Only the existence of a high level cover-up within the authority, including the collusion of Monitoring Officers, has prevented Councillor Kenyon’s arrest. Yet Councillor Kenyon has not even offered an apology.

As a result of Councillor Kenyon’s refusal to resign and the failure of the Police Authority to take the appropriate action, North Yorkshire Police is now the only Police force in the civilised world where the person in charge of maintaining standards and holding the police to account, is openly admitted to have committed one criminal offence and is maintaining her right to silence in respect of other well-documented allegations of criminal offences.

This makes Councillor Kenyon, North Yorkshire Police and the North Yorkshire Police Authority a national laughing stock.

Councillor Kenyon has brought North Yorkshire and North Yorkshire Police into national –perhaps international – disrepute and failed utterly in her duty as a Councillor not to bring the Authorities on which she serves into disrepute.

Her only honourable course of action now is to resign.”

Tim Hick’s relentless investigation into corruption in North Yorkshire Police and on the Police Authority is continuing. My information is that there are to be further revelations of the gravest kind concerning another member of the authority towards the end of the week.


Related reading:

NYPA ADMITS MISCONDUCT 

Posted by on July 10, 2012. Filed under Nigel Ward - In My View. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can leave a response or trackback to this entry
Say No To Joe Plant North Yorkshire County Council Double Dipper

Say No To Joe - Read About It Here

12 Responses to Jane Kenyon Story In Private Eye

  1. neil scott Reply

    July 10, 2012 at 3:28 pm

    This is not the worst case,neil scott has a string of evidence to connect ray Mallon operation lancett Police force in Cleveland and 23 false arrests and malicious prosecution,tampering with Evidence,tampering with a jury,falsified evidence,house insurance fraud,2x murder attempts on Neil scotts Life,Manipulation of Evidence which cannot be removed from public View at 160,800 Burglar Neil Scott facebook Lauraneiltina on Twitter

  2. Peter Hofschröer Reply

    July 12, 2012 at 4:44 am

    The text of the “Private Eye” exposure of Dear Jane can be found on:

    http://grandmabarbara.wordpress.com/1-new-items/exposure-begins/

    “Private Eye” tell me they will be “returning to this issue” at a later date.

  3. Al Roberts Reply

    July 12, 2012 at 9:15 am

    Not a big Facebook fan Glen, but,

    Are you coming here and clicking like and then leaving again? I have to admit I do accept that invitation to “like”, and if I feel I can contribute a factual comment then I will.

    Do Whitby people care? I think there is a minority that do care, possibly because their caring nature has caused them to question what appear to be uncaring decisions affecting Whitby, that are being made by a remotely based SBC, who rely on the apathy of an apparent majority, (who clearly don’t care enough), to carry out those decisions.

    Do you think Real Whitby is right in running these stories? In an ideal world there should be no need to run any critical articles, unfortunately the facts brought to light, by those who do care, show that those who are entrusted to run our society are apparently not fit to do so. Real Whitby is the only local platform that will allow public and factual criticism, I hope that policy will continue.
    Come on Whitby people lets hear from you. Sorry but, as a Scarborian, I fail to meet that criteria, however I do agree with much of what is written on this site, particularly by those who wish Whitby to run itself, as I think that Scarborough too would benefit from “devolution”.

  4. David Clark Reply

    July 12, 2012 at 1:31 pm

    Well done Rob, I admire you. “How can it be that the CFO, Director, Secretary, Agent for service of process, of a suspended California Corporation can be Chairman of a British Police Authority”?

  5. Nigel Ward Site Author Reply

    July 12, 2012 at 2:31 pm

    VERY IMPORTANT QUESTION asked by recently-resigned (from WTC) TOM BROWN – for consideration at the next SBC Council Meeting on 20th Jult 2012.

    ———- Forwarded message ———-
    From: Tom Brown
    Date: 12 July 2012 11:36
    Subject: Scarborough Borough Council
    To: ce@scarborough.gov.uk

    Councillors and Officers,

    In the public interest, I am writing to you both in order to lodge a formal request for the following question to be addressed at Council
    on 20th July 2012.

    “What steps are the Leader and the Chief Executive intending to implement in response to nationally reported allegations that a Portfolio Holder and/or a Head of Service may have acted in such a way as to jeopardise the good standing and reputation of Scarborough Borough Council?”

    Please confirm receipt of this email.

    Regards,

    Tom Brown
    _____________________________________________

    I doubt that Tom will recive the courtesy of a response, much less due consideration by the elected members. What a shady bunch.

    • Nigel Ward Site Author Reply

      July 12, 2012 at 8:04 pm

      As one would anticipate . . .

      ——— Forwarded message ———-
      From: Gill Wilkinson
      Date: 12 July 2012 17:47
      Subject: RE: Scarborough Borough Council
      To: Tom Brown
      Cc: Admin

      Dear Mr Brown,
      Thank you for your email.

      There is no public question time at full council meetings. The
      Council’s constitution only allows Elected Members to ask questions
      and states:

      Members may only ask a question under Rule 10.2 if either:
      (a) they have given at least 2 clear days notice in writing of the question to
      the Chief Executive; or
      (b) the question relates to urgent matters, they have the consent of the
      Mayor, and notice of the question in writing is given to the Chief
      Executive by 10.00 am on the day of the meeting.

      Regards
      Gill
      Gill Wilkinson
      Democratic and Administrative Services Manager

  6. ken graham Reply

    July 12, 2012 at 6:11 pm

    I am assured that there is going to be more revelations on Real Whitby come Friday lunch time.
    WATCH THIS SPACE!!

  7. David Clark Reply

    July 13, 2012 at 9:33 am

    Mr. Latham. Double standards, Ive been challenging them for years in this case. “How can there be one law for one and not for another”? Whats sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander.!!!

  8. F L C Reply

    July 17, 2012 at 9:41 pm

    Just how long are the police going to sit on it and do nothing….?

    The longer they leave it, the more they look like their a) incompetent, b) unwilling to do anything, c) unable to do something, d) all of the above, etc.

  9. Peter Hofschröer Reply

    July 18, 2012 at 6:05 am

    The problem the authorities have here is that Dear Jane appears to be the lynch-pin of the crime syndicate running North Yorkshire. If she goes down, rest assured she will turn Queen’s evidence to minimise the damage to herself.

    Where does that leave the rest of them?

    “They’ll all go together when they go”.

  10. Neil Scott Reply

    February 11, 2013 at 5:29 am

    Current Criminal Mayor Ray Mallon.

    @WorstCouncillo­­rs. @WorstMP. @WorstMayor.
    @WorstCheif. @WorsTTown. @Middlesbrough http://Wp.me/­p2euOV-4.

    http://­photos-b.ak.fbcd­n.net/­hphotos-ak-prn1/­48155_1426676792­28243_115524662­9_a.jpg

    Cleveland police Farce,DC 1309 Alastair Crawford,told courts
    that He convicted me in a statement that he Did Swap My
    Blood,falsified­­ ­ Blood evidence, Tampered with Forensics
    Evidence,interf­­ered with the course of justice,When he stated
    that the Prosecutions CONTINUITY was Flawed By Him,at this
    £50,900. @EveningGazette­­ Burglary conviction,Firs­t conviction
    in 46 years,All data hekd against me unconvicted,was Abused by this force was given to all employers,and its against my human rights

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. You can also subscribe without commenting.