NYCC Funding Conservative Party Jollies?

NYCC (ie: the taxpayer) Funding Conservative Party Jollies?

  • TIM THORNE reports on a new conception of the phrase “Siphon some petrol – we’re off to a party!”.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Real Whitby readers may remember a few recent articles about the mileage of Councillors at North Yorkshire County Council (NYCC).

From the NYCC data, we established that during a three year period sufficient mileage was claimed to drive to the moon each year, gravity not withstanding! It sounds dramatic, but given the size of our county we can expect higher mileage claims from our County Councillors relative to most other counties.

The data provided by NYCC was further scrutinised and it was possible to find out which Councillors incurred the highest mileage cost relative to the distance they lived from County Hall in Northallerton. The number of meetings attended was also factored in. The Councillors who topped the list were generally members of the Executive Committee with a few notable exceptions.

Research on individual mileage claim sheets ensued. Mileage sheets were requested for the last three financial years for the top eleven claiming Councillors. NYCC refused the request stating it was too much work. Under the terms of the FOI act they can probably get away with that refusal. Perhaps there is a case for all Councils providing this information as part of their normal duties, in the interests of transparency. But as we know, Councils don’t like members of the public sniffing around.

The end result of the NYCC FOI refusal was that requests had to be made for the mileage sheets of individual Councillors. The last set of mileage sheets from NYCC revealed that the chairman of the Police and Crime Panel, Carl Les, had a few questions to answer about his ‘Impossible Journeys’, which Nigel documented.

The most recent FOI response produced some very interesting information.

I asked for the mileage claim sheets of County Councillor David Jeffels, (Conservative – Seamer & Derwent Valley Division) from NYCC, which I duly received.

I also asked for County Councillor Jeffels’ mileage claim forms from Scarborough Borough Council (SBC), where Councillor Jeffels is also an elected member, but sadly they’ve yet to answer the FOI request, which is nothing out of the ordinary for SBC!

The mileage claim sheets revealed that County Councillor Jeffels claimed 710 miles for travel to Conservative Group meetings, which equates to £284 over the last couple of years. This information precipitated some more questions, which I’ve asked through the FOI process.

I was under the impression that Councils were supposed to be politically neutral, so why are NYCC funding County Councillor Jeffel’s trips to Conservative Group meetings?

GOLDEN_YEARS

I was also under the impression that trips to political meetings were not an approved duty. Once again, why are NYCC funding County Councillor Jeffel’s trips to Conservative Group meetings?

Informal conversation with a number of other Councillors seems to suggest that it is well known by elected members that they are not entitled to claim for party political journeys.

If trips to Conservative Group meetings are not an approved duty, then why is NYCC paying for County Councillor Jeffel’s trips to said meetings? Was the NYCC Audit Department made redundant some time ago? Or is the Audit Department asleep at the wheel?

County Councillors live an average of 70 miles from County Hall. If all Councillors attended quarterly political meetings at County Hall, this would equate to 20,160 miles claimed or £8k per annum, which would be around 10% of all mileage claimed, given current figures.

Given that the Conservatives are the majority party in North Yorkshire, this would mean that Conservative activities are funded by the tax payer, to the tune of £5k, with much smaller amounts going to other political parties.

Just how widespread is the practice of allowing Councillors to claim mileage for attending political group meetings? Is it countrywide?

Does the County Council provide the facilities to host these political group meetings and if so at what cost to the tax payer? Does the County Council provide catering for the meetings and if so at what cost to the tax payer? Does the County Council also pay for overnight stays to attend these political group meetings and if so at what cost to the tax payer?

So many questions…

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

County Councillor David Jeffels was given the opportunity to comment
on his mileage claims on the 10th July, but indicated (on 16th July)
that a response would come from the Deputy Chief Executive of NYCC
Carole Dunn (who is also the Head of Legal & Democratic Services and
Monitoring Officer).
Nothing has been received from Carole Dunn thus far, but her comments
(if any) will be added to the comments section in due course.

Other NYCC Articles:

NYCC Out Of Control?

Yorkshire Councils Pipped For National Award

County Council: Collusion, Cover-Ups and Coincidences?

Police Chief’s Impossible Journeys

NYCC Car Allowances – Nice Work If You Can Get It!

MUGSHOT_JEFFELS

 

11 Responses to "NYCC Funding Conservative Party Jollies?"

  1. Peter Hofschröer  July 18, 2013 at 5:35 pm

    One wonders if the honourable councillors in question are claiming the mileage for these jounrey from both NYCC and their respective political parties.

    Nah! That could not be the case, that would be “double-dipping”, a fraudulent act.

    Couldn’t imagine any of them doing that.

    Robert Goodwill would be the first to notice and put a stop to it.

    Reply
  2. Jane Swales  July 18, 2013 at 6:07 pm

    How many times can a Councillor be thoroughly and publicly discredited yet still find the brass neck to enter a Council Chamber?

    Reply
    • Peter Hofschröer  July 18, 2013 at 6:14 pm

      As the rest of them are at it as well, who is going to pull them up when they enter a council chamber?

      Politicians in the once proud country of Britain see expenses fraud as a legitimate perk of the job.

      Who is going to stop them? The police officers making fraudulent expense claims themselves?

      Reply
      • Tim Thorne  July 18, 2013 at 7:52 pm

        Will it be NYCC Senior Officers? Probably not as they appear to be under Police investigation:

        http://www.real-whitby.co.uk/nycc-out-of-control

        Its an odd county we live in. Surely they can’t all be like this, can they?

        Reply
        • Peter Hofschröer  July 19, 2013 at 2:33 pm

          The straight politician lives in the same street as the straight cop, who lives next door to the straight judge. Want to know where that is? In a place called never-never land.

          Reply
      • James Miller  July 19, 2013 at 4:46 am

        Interesting comment Peter. It was quite mind blowing when they extended the allowances of the Lib-Dem and Labour Group leaders to give them more money even though each of these groups fell slightly short of the 10% of members needed to get the extra ‘allowances’. This effectively shuts up any other major party trying to raise the subject of allowances/expenses of members without criticising their own group leaders. Well the smaller groups weren’t going to turn down an extra freebie and after all, only the tax payers lose.

        Reply
  3. Carole Gerada  July 18, 2013 at 7:37 pm

    And we won’t be able to change our County Councillors for another long 4 years……

    Reply
  4. Frank Chalmers  July 18, 2013 at 7:57 pm

    How many of them have used their “claim form” for purposes other than “political meetings”? Can the parties in question PROVE that meetings were held on the days claimed, given that these are elected members in public service, why aren’t they forthcoming with information?

    Just what are they hiding for?

    As they are fond of saying:

    “If they have nothing to hide, they have nothing to fear”

    Reply
  5. Dave  July 19, 2013 at 10:46 am

    How many actual votes did each of these Politicians, Councillors get when the elections were held?..It could be that they are acting outside their remit and mandate and there for it could easily be proven that they are acting ultra vires and therefore unlawfully…

    What was their mandate when entering office?..And what is their individual remit? i.e. what were they claiming they were going to accomplish for the Constituents when they ran for Office?..We are living in very strange times indeed..!

    Reply
  6. Trisha NF  July 19, 2013 at 4:08 pm

    These people are voted in by somebody, but time after time, when it’s too late for another few years (in this case, four) there are moans, groans grumbles etc etc ad nauseum… It’ll be the same at the 2015 General Election. It’ll be the same old story until Britain wakes up and kicks the old gang(s) into touch!!!

    Reply
  7. Ian Detute  July 24, 2013 at 6:38 pm

    As a council tax payer i feel the need to express an opinion on this. They are a bunch of robbing bastards who have no morals and the ones that are letting them get away with this are no fucking better.The low level council workers are salt of the earth but this bunch of elitist wankers are nothing more than common thieves no matter how they dress it up THEFT is THEFT.If it was a low level worker caught stealing something they would be made an example of.What gives these fuckers the right to think its ok. GRRRRRRRRRRRREEEEEEEDDDDDDYYYYYY CUNTS

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. You can also subscribe without commenting.