Go to Admin » Appearance » Widgets » and move Gabfire Widget: Social into that MastheadOverlay zone

Bedroom tax’ will hit single parents and disabled people hardest
Nearly a quarter of those due to be affected by the so-called “spare bedroom tax” will be single parents, according to new research.
Government figures show that 150,000 of the 660,000 people expected to have their benefits reduced because they have at least one unused room are lone parents under 60.
The average amount taken from each person per week is £13, which amounts to £676 a year, according to the party’s analysis.
The claim comes amid new concerns that disabled people will also be disproportionately affected by the change in benefit rules, due to be introduced in April.
New rules state that housing benefit and universal credit claimants deemed to have one unused bedroom in their council or housing association home will lose 14% of their housing benefit and those with two or more will lose 25%.
The Department for Work and Pensions estimates that 660,000 people living in social housing will lose an average of £728 per year as a result of the change.
Labour’s shadow work and pensions secretary Liam Byrne said: “David Cameron promised to stand up for parents, but his bedroom tax is a £100m tax bombshell for single mums and dads.
“The bedroom tax has now been exposed as a chaotic disaster, but it’s not too late for the prime minister to do the decent thing, admit he has got this wrong and think again.”
The planned changes will also affect hundreds of thousands of disabled people, according to the National Housing Federation.
A fund to help people eligible for disability living allowance was given a £30m boost this year by Cameron. But an analysis of figures by the federation claims that this will leave a £100m shortfall which will have to be made up by claimants.
David Orr, chief executive of the National Housing Federation, said: “The bedroom tax is ill-thought and unfair as thousands of disabled people will have no choice but to cut back further on food and other expenses in order to stay in their own homes.”
A DWP spokesperson said: “Councils have been given an extra £155m this year so that they can help their vulnerable tenants, with £30m specifically targeted towards supporting disabled people who have modified their homes and foster carers.
“We need to ensure a better use of social housing when over a quarter of a million tenants are living in overcrowded homes and 2 million are on housing waiting lists.”
guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010
Published via the Guardian News Feed plugin for WordPress.
Andrea Smith
March 4, 2013 at 7:40 pm
Would you expect any different. The Conservatives under Cameron have targeted the worst off members of society since the day they were elected. Im sure there will be worse to come yet.
Theadore Sundance
March 4, 2013 at 7:44 pm
I know a disabled lady who tried to take her own life after her DLA was suspended. This Government has blood on its hands.
sarraceniac
March 5, 2013 at 6:16 am
A lady I know, with severe depression and resulting agoraphobia, had her DLA arbitrarily cut off despite 3 doctors, including her psychiatrist, swearing that she was unable to work. It took 6 months to come to appeal and 10 minutes for the panel to decide that the box ticker who suspended her was wrong. And so was her previous level. They awarded her the higher level back-dated. So although, it was very upsetting for her, it back-fired on the Con-Dems. However, she has now been ordered to reappear before an assessment panel again less than a year after the whole debacle. It is costing more than it is is potentially saving.
Colin Brittain
March 5, 2013 at 6:50 pm
Iv’e heard that if your small bedroom is 70 sq ft or under it is classed as a boxroom and is exempt from the bedroom tax, this is listed under the housing act 1985 section 326. Something very much worth looking into as the housing act 1985 cannot be changed by law?
wendy
March 8, 2013 at 6:52 pm
Greed pure greed. If it were not for the bonuses paid for getting people with disabilities into work and keeping them there they wouldn’t be so quick to tick the wrong boxes.