real whitby facebook group

Widgetized Section

Go to Admin » Appearance » Widgets » and move Gabfire Widget: Social into that MastheadOverlay zone

An Appeal to Police & Crime Commissioner Mrs Julia MULLIGAN

101 Things To Do In Whitby

An Appeal to North Yorkshire Police & Crime Commissioner Mrs Julia MULLIGAN

  • This communication consists entirely of my opinion, the right to express which is conferred upon me under the terms of Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights 1948, to which this country is a co-signatory.



I have written today (1st December 2013) to Mrs Julia MULLIGAN, Police & Crime Commissioner for North Yorkshire. The letter is my Appeal to her to address, as she has previously committed to do, the many issues raised on Real Whitby regarding very serious lapses in moral probity on the part of high-profile members of the local authorities here in North Yorkshire.

Readers who share my concerns are free to email Mrs Julia MULLIGAN in support of my Appeal:

Thank you.



Whitby, 1st December 2013.


I write to proffer my most heartfelt encomiums.

The action you have taken, together with Chief Constable Dave JONES of the North Yorkshire Police (NYP), to recover the ‘Personal Development Fund’ payments disbursed to former Chief Constable Graeme MAXWELL and former Deputy Chief Constable Adam BRIGGS brings your first year in office to a stirring, if unheralded, climax. I applaud you. Bravo!

Moreover, your action demonstrates unequivocally that you possess the courage and integrity to confront this nadir of cronyism under which such morally unjustifiable payments were disbursed to men who have since been proven to be a disgrace and a mortification to the Force whose reputation and good-standing in the community now lies largely in your hands.

I must confess, however, that I doubted your resolve on any matter likely to entail criticism of your ‘predecessor’, (now) Alderman Jane KENYON – presently the Portfolio Holder for Finance, Procurement & Legal at Scarborough Borough Council and formerly Chair of the now-defunct North Yorkshire Police Authority (NYPA) and its equally defunct Management Board (NYPAMB).

It is some years now since a member of the public had the temerity to ask, at a public meeting of the NYPA, that very pertinent question:

  • “How can it be that two officers of a suspended California Corporation can hold Public Office in Britain”?

It is, of course, no secret that David CLARK (for it was he who raised that question) was referring to Ms Jane KENYON and her life-partner Parish Councillor T.W. ‘Bill’ MILLER. To this day, he awaits a reasoned response. In the light of your recent action, surely an answer must now be forthcoming?

The public domain is replete with detailed coverage of other excesses of financial ineptitude authorised by Ms Jane KENYON’s during her tenure at the NYPA and the NYPAMB.

I refer of course, to the astonishing matter of the £500K purchase of the fleet of completely unsuitable Volvo P70s and Range Rovers, the £400K to Mrs Peta ACKERLY (wife of former Superintendent Paul ACKERLY, and the much-lampooned en suite bathroom provided for the personal hygiene of former Chief Constable Della CANNING – all authorised during the tenure of Ms Jane KENYON.

These lapses form a lamentable record for anyone entrusted with control of the public purse, and yet Scarborough Borough Councillor Tom FOX, who is, of course, Chair of the SBC Cabinet (and who, you will recall, found himself unable to meet my eye throughout the two hours of your ‘Time to Talk’ PR-event at the Stephen Joseph Theatre in Scarborough on 23rd October 2013), has found himself equally unable to provide a simple “Yes” or “No” response to my oft re-iterated question, in the public interest, first posed eighteen months ago on 1st July 2012:

  • “Are you currently satisfied with your appointment of the present Portfolio Holder for Finance, Procurement and Legal?”

Councillor Tom FOX finds himself between a rock and a very hard place here – for how, in the light of Councillor Jane KENYON’s thirty-year record of abysmal financial blunders, can he say “Yes”?

And how – without confirming a calamitous failure of judgement on his own part – how can he say “No”?

But Councillor Tom FOX has more pressing matters beleaguering him at present. In recent days, he has been openly and publicly accused of complicity in Police brutality pertaining to the silencing of a witness, with its concomitant consequence of a potential charge of perverting the course of justice.

Which leads us to the inexplicable matter of the determined cover-up of the innumerable allegations against former Scarborough Mayor and Councillor, Alderman Peter JACONELLI, whose abuse of his position allowed his serial predatory homosexual paedophilia to go unchallenged, let alone investigated, prosecuted or punished from (at latest) 1953 to his death in 1998. Since 13th February 2013, a dozen or more independent witnesses (i.e. victims) have come forward, starting with an acting (now former) Scarborough Borough Councillor – Geoff EVANS.

Again, Councillor Tom FOX has evaded my question, first posed on 18th February 2013, in the public interest:

  • “What is the intention of the Leader in respect of the many serious allegations, every bit as horrific as those against Jimmy SAVILE, against former Councillor and Mayor Peter JACONELLI, in respect of his status as Alderman of the Borough. Is there a process in train for the Council to adopt the same approach as in the SAVILE case?” 

I am not alone in demanding an answer to this question; on the contrary, it is being asked by an increasing number of victims – victims whom you have promised a voice – as well as Councillors and even former Police Officers. The title of Alderman is now and forever tainted.

North Yorkshire Police has nothing to say on the matter, yet every resident of the Borough of Scarborough with whom I have discussed the matter (many of whom were, like me, teenagers in the early nineteen-sixties) has asserted that reports of JACONELLI’s conduct (and impunity) were rife and uncontested half a century ago – and ever since.

Are we to believe that only Councillor Tom FOX, the former Scarborough Police Inspector, remained in blissful ignorance?

Now we learn that Whitby Memorial Hospital is to form part of the NHS investigation into the Jimmy SAVILE abuses. Will your office be offering a statement regarding NYP’s historical record of intelligence surrounding the hospital?

Returning to Ms Jane KENYON and her life-partner Councillor T.W. MILLER, I would like your Chief Constable to explain to the member of the public for whom I act as the Authorised Complaint Friend how it is that the initial Police Statement which she delivered, in my company, to the Malton Police Station office of the Major Fraud Investigation Team of the NYP on Wednesday 24th October 2012.

The Statement, alleging bank fraud and forgery, was presented to DC Melanie SPANTON, who took a photocopy, but declined to formally accept it or log it as evidence.

On 5th December 2012, we were informed (by the same Officer) that the investigation was being passed to the Durham Constabulary (on grounds of the ‘political sensitivity’ of the accused) who would be instructed to include me in their investigation, and there would be a “clear need” to accept the Statement and other evidence. It was never requested. No evidence was taken.

The Durham Constabulary did not pursue the investigation and, having excluded me from their communications with the Complainant, finally informing the Complainant by telephone that the investigation was being passed back to the North Yorkshire Police. That was in early May 2013.

On 11th September 2013, having been pressed by me for information regarding the progress of the case, Deputy Chief Constable Tim MADGWICK wrote to me to declare

“With regard to the separate allegations made by [NAME REDACTED] (for whom I note that you also indicate that you are acting as “authorised Complaint Friend”), the current position is being clarified by North Yorkshire Police Financial Investigation Unit in this regard and contact will be made with Ms Miller in due course.”

Today is 1st December 2013. How long does the Financial Investigation Unit need to evaluate a brief initial Statement and progress to its formal acceptance and investigation? Another year is slipping away.

Like Councillor Tom FOX, Deputy Chief Constable Tim MADGWICK also faces serious allegations in regard to the intimidation of investigative-journalist and chartered accountant Tim HICKS, who has reported on actions taken by DCC Tim MADGWICK at the behest of – then Chair of the NYPA, Jane KENYON.

Is this the standard of policing generally in North Yorkshire? Are victims of financial crimes committed by common criminals – rather than career-long members of the establishment who happen to be close acquaintances and friends of ranking Police Officers – forced to wait over a year for absolutely nothing to happen?

I put it to you that my assertion to Chief Constable Dave JONES at your ‘Time to Talk’ PR-Session in Scarborough – namely, that there appear to be two distinct classes within the application of the justice system in North Yorkshire – is beginning to appear unassailable.

Those two classes are: the common man – and the self-serving and corrupt élitist ‘cronies’.

I am far from being alone in that view.

How else are we to comprehend the inordinate delay in each of these cases? How can it be that the perusal of twenty-four sides of A4 (being the twelve monthly Mileage Claims Forms of two distinct and separate institutions upon which County Councillor Carl LES has served) drag on from March 2013 to the present day – with no charges in sight?

And three years down the road, no charges have been brought in respect of the widespread abuse of the £1.7M Me Too!” Voucher Scheme, in which prodigious sums were expertly funnelled to relatives of those promoting the scheme. On 26th October 2012, County Councillor Joe PLANT (a protégé of Councillor Jane KENYON, and deeply implicated in the “Me Too!” scandal) promised “a frank & honest statement” regarding his ‘double-dipping’. We are still waiting.

We learn this week that no charges are to be brought against former-Councillor Tim LAWN, who apparently did commit an offence, but ‘without criminal intent’. What was Graeme MAXWELL’s intent when he committed gross misconduct? Or Adam BRIGGS? Or the Officers who allegedly assaulted an innocent detainee in the cells of Scarborough Police Station? Did they have criminal intent? Did Peter JACONELLI have criminal intent? Did Jimmy SAVILE have criminal intent?

Councillors and Council Officers appear to operate under the auspices of a protection racket.

Julia, I write to you as a common man – one of the herd. I am a simple man. I left school at fifteen; but my curiosity made of me a great reader and keen traveller who taught himself to be a writer, a film-maker and a symphonist. In the course of my life, ridden with mistakes and failures, the simplest and the greatest truth I have learned is this: that at the very kernel of our civilization, our society, our community, lies the innate sense we all share of what is right – and what is wrong.

It is wrong to ‘double-dip’ from two pots for the same reimbursement.

It is wrong to accept – then betray – the public trust for one’s own ends.

It is wrong to use privileged information for private gain.

It is wrong to pervert the course of justice.

You cannot rebut me. Wrong is wrong. And no amount of clever words from clever lawyers and clever Monitoring Officers will change what we all know in our hearts. Wrong is wrong.

So I humbly appeal to you, having grasped the nettle of the ‘Personal Development Fund’ emoluments, to go forward and address the issues that you declined to address with me at your ‘Time to Talk’ PR-session, when you made a thrice-stated commitment to meet me to examine these issues. You have yet to make good on your word.

I am at your service, Julia.

And I wish you bon courage!

Yours, with very kind regards,


PS – I intend to publish this Appeal into the public domain. I trust that meets with your approval?


CORRUPTION is the abuse of entrusted power for private gain. It hurts everyone who depends on the integrity of people in a position of authority” - (Definition: Transparency International)


Posted by on December 1, 2013. Filed under Featured,News,Nigel Ward - In My View. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can leave a response or trackback to this entry

33 Responses to An Appeal to Police & Crime Commissioner Mrs Julia MULLIGAN

  1. Ian Detute Reply

    December 1, 2013 at 5:12 pm

    Excellent and heartfelt Nigel i only hope Ms Mulligan acts.

  2. Paul Saunderson Reply

    December 1, 2013 at 5:44 pm

    Mrs Mulligan acts every day. All she needs to do instead is her job.

    I know, pigs might fly….

  3. Brian Dodds Reply

    December 1, 2013 at 6:58 pm

    It is possible that like a lot of other political figures Mrs Mulligan makes statements of intent in the public eye that she has no intention of following through. I hope and pray that, in this instance, I am completely mistaken in this belief, but other than the action taken to recoup the personal development payments to the above named individuals, to date her record does not inspire confidence. As always we will have to wait and see what develops in the near future, I hope Mrs. Mulligan has the personal integrity and moral fibre to make good on her promises and clean out the whole nest of corrupt individuals that infest the halls of power in the county of North Yorkshire, excellent letter Nigel, good job mate.

  4. Nick Henderson Reply

    December 1, 2013 at 7:22 pm

    Eloquent, and to the point – on many points, in fact.

    Let’s hope that all the issues raised are addressed.

    I certainly have my issues, with the NYP, and Jane KENYON – which are kindly being investigated by Dave JONES.

    I’m confident it will be solved to my satisfaction…

  5. Paul Saunderson Reply

    December 1, 2013 at 7:30 pm

    Well, er, Mrs Mulligan’s husband, North Yorkshire County Councillor Patrick Mulligan is a double-dipper. so when will she be asking him to pay back the excess claim he made?

    And then there is this unanswered question:

    If Mrs Mulligan’s firm did get the contract, then when is she going to pay back that money?

  6. Taara Astra Reply

    December 1, 2013 at 11:50 pm

    The country Need’s to wake up,

  7. pierotte Reply

    December 2, 2013 at 3:26 am

    ty shared

  8. David Clark Reply

    December 2, 2013 at 10:51 am

    May I applaud Ms Mulligan and Chief Constable Jones on actions taken so far,though there is more to do. I have been told in the past that the goings on in the USA have never been investigated by NYP. The solution to the problem lies between the “Poulson Criminal Trial” in 1974.and the Belvedere Computers Inc. between 1980 and 1982. As usual Nigel another well written article,keep it up positive resolution to the situation is in sight.

  9. GERALD. Reply

    December 2, 2013 at 1:32 pm

    Prepare for the worst ??? How long till the next police and crime commisioner election ??? Mrs Julia MULLIGAN, Police & Crime Commissioner for North Yorkshire, may have limited time in the job, and will possibly have to worry if the next elected Commisioner will investigate Mrs Mulligans period in office. Maybe a complete audit of every penny spent. Whether her connections and family members made gains. Its possible.

  10. Paul Saunderson Reply

    December 3, 2013 at 8:39 am

    Here’s a good one:

    It would seen that Julia Mulligan and Dave Clark have never discussed the Savile affair…

    Now is that not a clear, public admission that neither of them have done their job?

    Are letters of resignation now not due?

  11. Nigel Reply

    December 3, 2013 at 9:02 am

    @ Paul:

    Forgive me for correcting you; I believe you mean there has been no contact on the SAVILE issue between Julia MULLIGAN and Dave JONES (the Chief Constable) – NOT Dave CLARK (the tireless exposer of Jane KENYON).

    Nevertheless, a very telling omission on the part of the two top Police administrators in North Yorkshire. I can only imagine that they have overlooked SAVILE because they are focussed on JACONELLI and the impact that he will ultimately have on Scarborough and the NYP.

  12. Paul Saunderson Reply

    December 3, 2013 at 10:02 am

    Thanks for the correction. I meant Davey Jones and not the Dave Clark Five.

    But do see this one:

    It seems nobody in authority in Yorkshire is prepared to investigate historical contacts with Savile.

  13. Nigel Reply

    December 3, 2013 at 10:16 am

    @ Paul: Thank you for that. So we see from your two recent FOIA requests that (i) P&CC Julia MULLIGAN and her Chief Constable have passed through her first year in office without engaging with one another on the SAVILE matter – and (ii) that York City Council assert that they never had any dealings with SAVILE, ever. It is almost as though the man never set foot in North Yorkshire. Do you believe that?

  14. Nick. Reply

    December 3, 2013 at 2:54 pm

    Here’s an interesting FOIA response.

    Their own definition of serious corruption is as follows:

    Serious Corruption:
    8.13 The term serious corruption refers to conduct that includes:
    • any attempt to pervert the course of justice or other conduct likely seriously to harm the administration of justice, in particular the criminal justice system;
    • payments or other benefits or other favours received in connection with the performance of duties amounting to an offence for which the individual concerned, if convicted, would be likely to receive a sentence of more than six months;
    • abuse of authority;
    • corrupt controller, handler or covert human intelligence source (CHIS) relationships;
    • provision of confidential information in return for payment or other benefits or favours where the conduct goes beyond a possible prosecution for an offence under Section 55 of the Data Protection Act 1998;
    • extraction and supply of seized controlled drugs, firearms or other material; or
    • attempts or conspiracies to do any of the above.

    Bang to rights… isn’t that right, Carl? Jane?

  15. Paul Saunderson Reply

    December 3, 2013 at 4:03 pm

    At the very least, we have admissions of gross dereliction of duty here. When are those concerned going to do the decent thing and resign?

  16. James Miller Reply

    December 4, 2013 at 9:40 am

    @Paul Sanderson. Thanks for that comment (question). I like a good laugh.

  17. Jkick Reply

    December 5, 2013 at 11:50 am


    @ Paul: Thank you for that. So we see from your two recent FOIA requests that (i) P&CC Julia MULLIGAN and her Chief Constable have passed through her first year in office without engaging with one another on the SAVILE matter – and (ii) that York City Council assert that they never had any dealings with SAVILE, ever. It is almost as though the man never set foot in North Yorkshire. Do you believe that?

    Well, he did set foot in the grounds of York racecourse, the year 1982. A few friends accompanied him, including the Bachelors and the Pope, John Paul II. There was a huge ‘behind the scenes’ operation going on. It was not long since Pope John Paul had been shot at pretty well point blank range in Rome. Security was an important issue.

    No one did background check on Jimmy Savile, yeh right.

    ( I posted photograhic evidence on Icke forum j savile thread

  18. Paul Saunderson Reply

    December 7, 2013 at 8:03 am

    @jkick. Thanks for your help-

    The Mulligan story is getting funnier by the day. Do see:

  19. Paul Saunderson Reply

    December 9, 2013 at 12:59 pm

  20. jkick Reply

    December 10, 2013 at 11:46 am

    @ Paul:

    If there really is any doubt, in the publics mind, of collusion between two parties (York Council / NYP) in the cover up in Jimmy Savile and child abuse, then ample evidence has been demonstated in their same respone to your FOI requests. It’s a damage limitation exercise, to cover up that Savile and his cronies sexually abused boys and girls with the full knowledge of leading members of York council and the North Yorkshire police. Julie Mulligan should be exposing these people, within her force and the council, who were in cohoots with Savile, not protecting them. Whilst they remain hidden, it sends out a message she is condoning the sexual abuse of our children.

  21. Paul Saunderson Reply

    December 10, 2013 at 6:47 pm

    It would certainly seem from the reaction of authorities all over Yorkshire that they were well aware of the activities of Savile and his “club” for the decades it was active in his lifetime, but are doing their best to pretend they did not know.

    It is difficult to believe that they all did so just for backhanders. It is also difficult to believe that the “club” ceased to exist when Savile died, as it clearly had many members.

    What is also interesting is the failure of the British police to make any arrests as a result of information received from Operation Spade.

    These facts, and many others coming into the public domain, indicate the level of child abuse by people in authority in Britain.

    That leads to the conclusion that there are many child abusers in positions of authority today and the reason officials in Yorkshire are keeping “stumm” about this is because they are all still at it.

    Britain is known internationally as the “sick country” and the “paedophile’s paradise”. Social workers will go so far as the drug you and rip your baby out of your womb to feed that trade.

    The world is waking up to what is going on here,

  22. pgallagher Reply

    December 15, 2013 at 5:45 pm

    Haha i was just thinking and the dodgy duo and the untouchables crossed my mind.

  23. Paul Saunderson Reply

    December 27, 2013 at 7:30 pm

    Here one I’ve just come across.

    The interview starts at: 28:37

  24. Stakesby Legs Reply

    December 27, 2013 at 10:18 pm

    Professor Hofschroer, I presume, Mr “Saunderson”?

  25. Paul Saunderson Reply

    December 29, 2013 at 4:54 pm

    Which intelligence agency is asking you to find out?

    • Common Purpose Graduate Reply

      December 29, 2013 at 7:35 pm

      We’re not an agency as such.

      • Paul Saunderson Reply

        December 30, 2013 at 7:22 am

        Ah! I see. Thank you for the explanation. So that would explain why none of you use your real names, eh?

        • Jane Swales Reply

          January 1, 2014 at 11:00 am

          No real name, no real opinion, Mr Hofschroer. Integrity begins with identity. If the identity of the writer is a lie, how should the reader believe any word from that writer?

          • Paul Saunderson Reply

            January 1, 2014 at 3:15 pm

            Are you another one of Nigel Ward’s alter egos?

            • Jane Swales Reply

              January 1, 2014 at 8:01 pm

              As a matter of fact, I’m one of his ex-girlfriends. So it goes.

              • Paul Saunderson Reply

                January 2, 2014 at 6:20 am

                Did he use his real name at the time?

  26. Steve Reply

    February 9, 2014 at 3:15 pm

    I do not know about anyone else, but I cannot see any like button at all, I am running windows 8.1.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. You can also subscribe without commenting.